08.11.2022 16:26, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
http://bugs.debian.org/1023654
I don't see where this changes the struct size:
Yeah, I noticed that too after filing that bugreport,
indeed, the problem not in the size of the structures,
but in the changed way - old inline functions used the
deprecated ring_kmask & ring_kentries, while the new
ones uses new ring_mask & ring_entries.
- unsigned pad[4];
+ unsigned ring_mask;
+ unsigned ring_entries;
+
+ unsigned pad[2];
But I see a problem when you compile against 2.3 and run against 2.2
as the new values are not filled.
The problem is the mixture of inline and non-inline functions...
Yeah.
The packaging should make sure it requires the version is build against...
It is either Depends: liburing2 > $version, or, if the ABI is broken like
this, it is Depends: liburing3 > $newversion (with the soname bump).
At any rate, this is not exactly samba problem, but it affects samba.
Thanks,
/mjt
