Re: questions about io_uring buffer select feature

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/14/22 08:41, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
hi,

I spent some time to learn the history of buffer select feature, especially
from https://lwn.net/Articles/813311/. According to the description in this
link:
     when doing the same IORING_OP_RECV, no buffer is passed in
     with the request. Instead, it's flagged with IOSQE_BUFFER_SELECT, and
     sqe->buf_group is filled in with a valid group ID. When the kernel can
     satisfy the receive, a buffer is selected from the specified group ID
     pool. If none are available, the IO is terminated with -ENOBUFS. On
     success, the buffer ID is passed back through the (CQE) completion
     event. This tells the application what specific buffer was used.

According to my understandings, buffer select feature is suggested to be
used with fast-poll feature, then in example of io_read(), for the first nowait
try, io_read() will always get one io_buffer even later there is no data
ready, eagain is returned and this req will enter io_arm_poll_handler().
So it seems that this behaviour violates the rule that buffer is only selected
when data is ready?

Right, that's how it was working, but recently Jens was queueing
patches to fix it, e.g. see io_kbuf_recycle(). I think it was
for 5.18.

And for ENOBUFS error, how should apps handle this error? Re-provide
buffers and re-issue requests from user space again? Thanks.

It sounds just right. If the userspace can't re-provide buffers,
I assume it may want to wait for some inflight requests to complete.

--
Pavel Begunkov



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux