questions about io_uring buffer select feature

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hi,

I spent some time to learn the history of buffer select feature, especially
from https://lwn.net/Articles/813311/. According to the description in this
link:
    when doing the same IORING_OP_RECV, no buffer is passed in
    with the request. Instead, it's flagged with IOSQE_BUFFER_SELECT, and
    sqe->buf_group is filled in with a valid group ID. When the kernel can
    satisfy the receive, a buffer is selected from the specified group ID
    pool. If none are available, the IO is terminated with -ENOBUFS. On
    success, the buffer ID is passed back through the (CQE) completion
    event. This tells the application what specific buffer was used.

According to my understandings, buffer select feature is suggested to be
used with fast-poll feature, then in example of io_read(), for the first nowait
try, io_read() will always get one io_buffer even later there is no data
ready, eagain is returned and this req will enter io_arm_poll_handler().
So it seems that this behaviour violates the rule that buffer is only selected
when data is ready?

And for ENOBUFS error, how should apps handle this error? Re-provide
buffers and re-issue requests from user space again? Thanks.


Regards,
Xiaoguang Wang




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux