On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 14:35, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 3/30/22 2:18 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 22:03, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Can you try and repull the branch? I rebased the top two, so reset to > >> v5.17 first and then pull it. > > > > This one works in all cases, except if there's a link flag on the > > read. In that case the read itself will succeed but following > > requests on the link chain will fail with -ECANCELED. > > That sounds like you're asking for more data than what is being read, > in which case the link should correctly break and cancel the rest. > That's expected behavior, a short read is not a successful read in that > regard. Sorry, I don't get it. Does the link flag has other meaning than "wait until this request completes before starting the next"? Thanks, Miklos
