On 3/30/22 2:18 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 22:03, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Can you try and repull the branch? I rebased the top two, so reset to >> v5.17 first and then pull it. > > This one works in all cases, except if there's a link flag on the > read. In that case the read itself will succeed but following > requests on the link chain will fail with -ECANCELED. That sounds like you're asking for more data than what is being read, in which case the link should correctly break and cancel the rest. That's expected behavior, a short read is not a successful read in that regard. -- Jens Axboe