On 6/5/21 1:43 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Andres, > > On Thu, Jun 03 2021 at 12:03, Andres Freund wrote: >> On 2021-06-01 23:53:00 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>> You surely made your point that this is well thought out. >> >> Really impressed with your effort to generously interpret the first >> version of a proof of concept patch that explicitly was aimed at getting >> feedback on the basic design and the different use cases. > > feedback on what? > > There is absolutely no description of design and obviously there is no > use case either. So what do you expect me to be generous about? That's a complete fallacy, the very RFC is about clarifying a use case that I was hinted about, not mentioning those I described you in a reply. Obviously -- Pavel Begunkov
