Andres,
On Thu, Jun 03 2021 at 12:03, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2021-06-01 23:53:00 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> You surely made your point that this is well thought out.
>
> Really impressed with your effort to generously interpret the first
> version of a proof of concept patch that explicitly was aimed at getting
> feedback on the basic design and the different use cases.
feedback on what?
There is absolutely no description of design and obviously there is no
use case either. So what do you expect me to be generous about?
Thanks,
tglx
