On 28/06/2020 16:49, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 6/27/20 5:04 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> All but [3/5] are different segfault fixes for
>> c40f63790ec9 ("io_uring: use task_work for links if possible")
>
> Looks reasonable, too bad about the task_work moving out of the
> union, but I agree there's no other nice way to avoid this. BTW,
> fwiw, I've moved that to the head of the series.
I think I'll move it back, but that would need more work to be
done. I've described the idea in the other thread.
--
Pavel Begunkov
