Re: [PATCH 0/5] "task_work for links" fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/27/20 5:04 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> All but [3/5] are different segfault fixes for
> c40f63790ec9 ("io_uring: use task_work for links if possible")

Looks reasonable, too bad about the task_work moving out of the
union, but I agree there's no other nice way to avoid this. BTW,
fwiw, I've moved that to the head of the series.

-- 
Jens Axboe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux