On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 04:07:45PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 02/18, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > otherwise I think this is correct, but how about the patch below? > > Then this code can be changed to use try_cmpxchg(). > > You have already sent the patch which adds the generic try_cmpxchg, > so the patch below can be trivially adapted. > > But I'd prefer another change, I think both task_work_add() and > task_work_cancel() can use try_cmpxchg() too. Yeah, I'll go change the lot, but maybe after Jens' patches, otherwise we're just creating merge conflicts.
