Re: [ISSUE] The time cost of IOSQE_IO_LINK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 09:16:34AM -0800, Jens Axboe wrote:
> OK, did the conversion, and it turned out pretty trivial, and reduces my
> lines as well since I don't have to manage the list side. See here:
> 
> https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/log/?h=io_uring-task-poll
> 
> Three small prep patches:
> 
> sched: move io-wq/workqueue worker sched in/out into helpers
> kernel: abstract out task work helpers
> sched: add a sched_work list

The __task_work_add() thing should loose the set_notify_resume() thing,
that is very much task_work specific. Task_work, works off of
TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME on return-to-user. We really don't want that set for
the sched_work stuff.

I've not looked too hard at the rest, I need to run to the Dojo, should
have some time laster tonight, otherwise tomorrow ;-)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux