On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:38:37PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > Looks good to me. > > Only thing I would possibly change is the thread name to not mislead > anyone into thinking this is the main and only i915 irq activity. > Looks to me it should just be called something like > i915/signaller:%u or similar. I wanted it fairly short for top (about 10 characters on a normal terminal iirc). There is nothing preventing us from having multiple irq threads (and preceding with irq seems to fit in with others). If we need more, I would suggest irq/i915:%u-signal -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
