During cleanup we have to synchronise with the async task we are using
to initialise and register our fbdev. Currently, we are using a full
synchronisation on the global domain, but we can restrict this to just
synchronising up to our task if we remember our cookie.
Whilst there, streamline the function parameters.
v2: async_synchronize_cookie() takes an exclusive upper bound, to
synchronize with our task we have to pass in the next cookie.
v3: Drop premature disregarding of the active cookie (we need to wait
until the task is complete before continuing in the teardown).
v4: Refactor waiting on async to incorporate a comment explaining why we
need the +1.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index 089a42577ea3..496c962426ac 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ struct intel_framebuffer {
struct intel_fbdev {
struct drm_fb_helper helper;
struct intel_framebuffer *fb;
+ async_cookie_t cookie;
int preferred_bpp;
};
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c
index 4babefc51eb2..45a03d87a659 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c
@@ -538,8 +538,7 @@ static const struct drm_fb_helper_funcs intel_fb_helper_funcs = {
.fb_probe = intelfb_create,
};
-static void intel_fbdev_destroy(struct drm_device *dev,
- struct intel_fbdev *ifbdev)
+static void intel_fbdev_destroy(struct intel_fbdev *ifbdev)
{
/* We rely on the object-free to release the VMA pinning for
* the info->screen_base mmaping. Leaking the VMA is simpler than
@@ -552,12 +551,14 @@ static void intel_fbdev_destroy(struct drm_device *dev,
drm_fb_helper_fini(&ifbdev->helper);
if (ifbdev->fb) {
- mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&ifbdev->helper.dev->struct_mutex);
intel_unpin_fb_obj(&ifbdev->fb->base, BIT(DRM_ROTATE_0));
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&ifbdev->helper.dev->struct_mutex);
drm_framebuffer_remove(&ifbdev->fb->base);
}
+
+ kfree(ifbdev);
}
/*
@@ -732,32 +733,44 @@ int intel_fbdev_init(struct drm_device *dev)
static void intel_fbdev_initial_config(void *data, async_cookie_t cookie)
{
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = data;
- struct intel_fbdev *ifbdev = dev_priv->fbdev;
+ struct intel_fbdev *ifbdev = data;
/* Due to peculiar init order wrt to hpd handling this is separate. */
if (drm_fb_helper_initial_config(&ifbdev->helper,
ifbdev->preferred_bpp))
- intel_fbdev_fini(dev_priv->dev);
+ intel_fbdev_fini(ifbdev->helper.dev);
}
void intel_fbdev_initial_config_async(struct drm_device *dev)
{
- async_schedule(intel_fbdev_initial_config, to_i915(dev));
+ struct intel_fbdev *ifbdev = to_i915(dev)->fbdev;
+
+ ifbdev->cookie = async_schedule(intel_fbdev_initial_config, ifbdev);
+}
+
+static void intel_fbdev_sync(struct intel_fbdev *ifbdev)
+{
+ if (!ifbdev->cookie)
+ return;
+
+ /* Only serialises with all preceding async calls, hence +1 */
+ async_synchronize_cookie(ifbdev->cookie + 1);
+ ifbdev->cookie = 0;
}
void intel_fbdev_fini(struct drm_device *dev)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
- if (!dev_priv->fbdev)
+ struct intel_fbdev *ifbdev = dev_priv->fbdev;
+
+ if (!ifbdev)
return;
flush_work(&dev_priv->fbdev_suspend_work);
-
if (!current_is_async())
- async_synchronize_full();
- intel_fbdev_destroy(dev, dev_priv->fbdev);
- kfree(dev_priv->fbdev);
+ intel_fbdev_sync(ifbdev);
+
+ intel_fbdev_destroy(ifbdev);
dev_priv->fbdev = NULL;
}
--
2.8.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
