Hi,
On 17 June 2016 at 15:23, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:09:50AM +0800, Xinliang Liu wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> I have tested your David's drm-next branch[1] which including this patch.
>> In most time it is ok. But when switching modes or disable/re-enable
>> mode, it will encounter bellow error msg:
>> --
>> [ 357.940728] [drm:drm_atomic_helper_commit_cleanup_done] *ERROR*
>> [CRTC:24:crtc-0] flip_done timed out
>> [ 368.004962] [drm:drm_atomic_helper_commit_cleanup_done] *ERROR*
>> [CRTC:24:crtc-0] flip_done timed out
>> [ 396.064871] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
>> [ 396.070548] 0-...: (3 GPs behind) idle=f4f/1/0 softirq=4253/4253 fqs=19
>> [ 396.077335] 7-...: (1 GPs behind) idle=71f/140000000000000/0
>> softirq=2444/2451 fqs=19
>> [ 396.085332] (detected by 1, t=6028 jiffies, g=3924, c=3923, q=246)
>> [ 396.091600] Task dump for CPU 0:
>> [ 396.094821] swapper/0 R running task 0 0 0 0x00000002
>> [ 396.101872] Call trace:
>> [ 396.104323] [<ffff000008085bec>] __switch_to+0xa4/0xd4
>> [ 396.109460] [<ffff000008c85000>] __boot_cpu_mode+0x0/0x80
>> [ 396.114852] Task dump for CPU 7:
>> [ 396.118072] Xorg R running task 0 1658 1646 0x00000002
>> [ 396.125121] Call trace:
>> [ 396.127562] [<ffff000008085c10>] __switch_to+0xc8/0xd4
>> [ 396.132695] [<ffff800035567110>] 0xffff800035567110
>> [ 396.137569] rcu_preempt kthread starved for 1000 jiffies! g3924
>> c3923 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(3) ->state=0x1
>> [ 396.147130] rcu_preempt S ffff000008085c10 0 7 2 0x00000000
>> [ 396.154180] Call trace:
>> [ 396.156620] [<ffff000008085c10>] __switch_to+0xc8/0xd4
>> [ 396.161758] [<ffff000008810490>] __schedule+0x188/0x590
>> [ 396.166978] [<ffff0000088108d4>] schedule+0x3c/0xa0
>> [ 396.171851] [<ffff00000881368c>] schedule_timeout+0x104/0x1a4
>> [ 396.177595] [<ffff00000810549c>] rcu_gp_kthread+0x54c/0x814
>> [ 396.183164] [<ffff0000080d3e5c>] kthread+0xd4/0xe8
>> [ 396.187951] [<ffff000008084e10>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x40
>> --
>>
>> Then the console stuck. Any tips for addressing this issue?
>> I am running a debian system.
>>
>> [1] git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-next
>
> hisilicon doesn't handle crtc_state->event correctly. Most likely when
> shutting down a CRTC if fails to send out that flip event, which means the
> waiting for flip_done times out. My patch tried to fix that (it's not
> correct, but it did work on other drivers).
>
> From a quick look what's wrong with hisilicon vblank handling:
> - You don't call drm_crtc_vblank_on/off, which means the core thinks
> vblanks will keep working even when the CRTC is off. That throws off the
> hack in my patch. You need to put a call to drm_crtc_vblank_off into
> crtc->disable hook, and drm_crtc_vblank_on into crtc->enable.
Yes, this is really a problem. I will add drm_crtc_vblank_on/off into
crtc->disable/enable hook.
And try.
>
> - While at it please review that the event sending is placed correctly and
> can't race with the new buffers showing up on the screen. The event
> should be signalled at exactly the time the buffers start to get scanned
> out. The important bit is to make sure that even if something races or
> gets delayed that it still happens together.
Our display controller has a interrupt to indicate that one
commit/flip is taken effect in hardware.
Should I put the sending event in this interrupt handler?
Thanks,
-xinliang
>
> Cheers, Daniel
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -xinliang
>>
>> On 2 June 2016 at 06:06, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > atomic_flush seems to be the right place, but I'm not entirely sure
>> > whether this will catch them all. It could be that when disabling the
>> > crtc we'll miss the vblank.
>> >
>> > While at it nuke the dummy functions.
>> >
>> > v2: Be more robust and either arm, when the CRTC is on, or just send
>> > the event out right away.
>> >
>> > Cc: Xinliang Liu <xinliang.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: Xinwei Kong <kong.kongxinwei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Acked-by: Xinliang Liu <xinliang.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/kirin/kirin_drm_ade.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
>> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/kirin/kirin_drm_ade.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/kirin/kirin_drm_ade.c
>> > index fba6372d060e..ed76baad525f 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/kirin/kirin_drm_ade.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/kirin/kirin_drm_ade.c
>> > @@ -502,13 +502,6 @@ static void ade_crtc_disable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>> > acrtc->enable = false;
>> > }
>> >
>> > -static int ade_crtc_atomic_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>> > - struct drm_crtc_state *state)
>> > -{
>> > - /* do nothing */
>> > - return 0;
>> > -}
>> > -
>> > static void ade_crtc_mode_set_nofb(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>> > {
>> > struct ade_crtc *acrtc = to_ade_crtc(crtc);
>> > @@ -537,6 +530,7 @@ static void ade_crtc_atomic_flush(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>> > {
>> > struct ade_crtc *acrtc = to_ade_crtc(crtc);
>> > struct ade_hw_ctx *ctx = acrtc->ctx;
>> > + struct drm_pending_vblank_event *event = crtc->state->event;
>> > void __iomem *base = ctx->base;
>> >
>> > /* only crtc is enabled regs take effect */
>> > @@ -545,12 +539,22 @@ static void ade_crtc_atomic_flush(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>> > /* flush ade registers */
>> > writel(ADE_ENABLE, base + ADE_EN);
>> > }
>> > +
>> > + if (event) {
>> > + crtc->state->event = NULL;
>> > +
>> > + spin_lock_irq(&crtc->dev->event_lock);
>> > + if (drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc) == 0)
>> > + drm_crtc_arm_vblank_event(crtc, event);
>> > + else
>> > + drm_crtc_send_vblank_event(crtc, event);
>> > + spin_unlock_irq(&crtc->dev->event_lock);
>> > + }
>> > }
>> >
>> > static const struct drm_crtc_helper_funcs ade_crtc_helper_funcs = {
>> > .enable = ade_crtc_enable,
>> > .disable = ade_crtc_disable,
>> > - .atomic_check = ade_crtc_atomic_check,
>> > .mode_set_nofb = ade_crtc_mode_set_nofb,
>> > .atomic_begin = ade_crtc_atomic_begin,
>> > .atomic_flush = ade_crtc_atomic_flush,
>> > --
>> > 2.8.1
>> >
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
