On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:31:20PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:50:59PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > For modern drivers pretty much the only thing drm_master does is > > handling authentication for the primary/legacy drm_minor node. Instead > > of having it all over drm files, move it all together into drm_auth.c. > > > > This patch just does code-motion, follow up patches will also extract > > the master logic from file open&release paths. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> > > What else is to come? Wondering why drm_auth.c rather than drm_master.c? Yeah, I guess we could rename it to drm_master, probably makes more sense. Otoh the only reason we have a drm_master is to support the DRM_AUTH ioctl restriction, so drm_auth seems to fit, too. I went with the lazy approach of sticking to what's there already ;-) -Daniel > > Looks mechanical, so > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson Mchris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
