On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 12:10:08PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Between acquiring the this_cpu_ptr() and using it, ideally we don't want > to be preempted and work on another CPU's private data. this_cpu_ptr() > checks whether or not preemption is disable, and get_cpu_ptr() provides > a convenient wrapper for operating on the cpu ptr inside a preemption > disabled critical section (which currently is provided by the > spinlock). Indeed if we disable preemption around this_cpu_ptr, > we do not need the CPU local spinlock - so long as take care that no other > CPU is running that code as do perform the cross-CPU cache flushing and > teardown, but that is a subject for another patch. > > [ 167.997877] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: usb-storage/216 > [ 167.997940] caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 > [ 167.997945] CPU: 7 PID: 216 Comm: usb-storage Tainted: G U 4.7.0-rc1-gfxbench-RO_Patchwork_1057+ #1 > [ 167.997948] Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Pro 3500 Series/2ABF, BIOS 8.11 10/24/2012 > [ 167.997951] 0000000000000000 ffff880118b7f9c8 ffffffff8140dca5 0000000000000007 > [ 167.997958] ffffffff81a3a7e9 ffff880118b7f9f8 ffffffff8142a927 0000000000000000 > [ 167.997965] ffff8800d499ed58 0000000000000001 00000000000fffff ffff880118b7fa08 > [ 167.997971] Call Trace: > [ 167.997977] [<ffffffff8140dca5>] dump_stack+0x67/0x92 > [ 167.997981] [<ffffffff8142a927>] check_preemption_disabled+0xd7/0xe0 > [ 167.997985] [<ffffffff8142a947>] debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 > [ 167.997990] [<ffffffff81507e17>] alloc_iova_fast+0xb7/0x210 > [ 167.997994] [<ffffffff8150c55f>] intel_alloc_iova+0x7f/0xd0 > [ 167.997998] [<ffffffff8151021d>] intel_map_sg+0xbd/0x240 > [ 167.998002] [<ffffffff810e5efd>] ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled+0x1d/0x20 > [ 167.998009] [<ffffffff81596059>] usb_hcd_map_urb_for_dma+0x4b9/0x5a0 > [ 167.998013] [<ffffffff81596d19>] usb_hcd_submit_urb+0xe9/0xaa0 > [ 167.998017] [<ffffffff810cff2f>] ? mark_held_locks+0x6f/0xa0 > [ 167.998022] [<ffffffff810d525c>] ? __raw_spin_lock_init+0x1c/0x50 > [ 167.998025] [<ffffffff810e5efd>] ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled+0x1d/0x20 > [ 167.998028] [<ffffffff815988f3>] usb_submit_urb+0x3f3/0x5a0 > [ 167.998032] [<ffffffff810d0082>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x122/0x1b0 > [ 167.998035] [<ffffffff81599ae7>] usb_sg_wait+0x67/0x150 > [ 167.998039] [<ffffffff815dc202>] usb_stor_bulk_transfer_sglist.part.3+0x82/0xd0 > [ 167.998042] [<ffffffff815dc29c>] usb_stor_bulk_srb+0x4c/0x60 > [ 167.998045] [<ffffffff815dc42e>] usb_stor_Bulk_transport+0x17e/0x420 > [ 167.998049] [<ffffffff815dcf32>] usb_stor_invoke_transport+0x242/0x540 > [ 167.998052] [<ffffffff810e5efd>] ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled+0x1d/0x20 > [ 167.998058] [<ffffffff815dba19>] usb_stor_transparent_scsi_command+0x9/0x10 > [ 167.998061] [<ffffffff815de518>] usb_stor_control_thread+0x158/0x260 > [ 167.998064] [<ffffffff815de3c0>] ? fill_inquiry_response+0x20/0x20 > [ 167.998067] [<ffffffff815de3c0>] ? fill_inquiry_response+0x20/0x20 > [ 167.998071] [<ffffffff8109ddfa>] kthread+0xea/0x100 > [ 167.998078] [<ffffffff817ac6af>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40 > [ 167.998081] [<ffffffff8109dd10>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x1f0/0x1f0 > > v2: convert preempt_disable(); var = this_cpu_ptr() to var = get_cpu_ptr() > v3: Actually use get_cpu_ptr (not get_cpu_var). Drop the spinlock > removal, concentrate on the immediate bug fix. > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96293 > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --- > drivers/iommu/iova.c | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iova.c b/drivers/iommu/iova.c > index ba764a0835d3..e23001bfcfee 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/iova.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iova.c > @@ -420,8 +420,10 @@ retry: > > /* Try replenishing IOVAs by flushing rcache. */ > flushed_rcache = true; > + preempt_disable(); > for_each_online_cpu(cpu) > free_cpu_cached_iovas(cpu, iovad); > + preempt_enable(); Why do you need to disable preemption here? The free_cpu_cached_iovas function does not need to stay on the same cpu as it iterates over the rcaches for all cpus anyway. Joerg _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
