On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 08:35:05PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> It's kinda pointless to have 2 separate mallocs for these. And when we
> add more per-connector state in the future it's even more pointless.
>
> Right now there's no such thing planned, but both Gustavo's per-crtc
> fence patches, and some nonblocking commit helpers I'm playing around
> with will add more per-crtc stuff. It makes sense to also consolidate
> connectors, just for consistency.
>
> In the future we can use this to store a pointer to the preceeding
> state, making an atomic update entirely free-standing. This will be
> needed to be able to queue them up with a depth > 1.
>
> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 27 +++++++++------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c | 2 +-
> include/drm/drm_atomic.h | 10 +++++-----
> include/drm/drm_crtc.h | 11 +++++++----
> 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> index 3ff1ed7b33db..a6395e9654af 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,6 @@
> void drm_atomic_state_default_release(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> {
> kfree(state->connectors);
> - kfree(state->connector_states);
> kfree(state->crtcs);
> kfree(state->crtc_states);
> kfree(state->planes);
> @@ -139,15 +138,15 @@ void drm_atomic_state_default_clear(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("Clearing atomic state %p\n", state);
>
> for (i = 0; i < state->num_connector; i++) {
> - struct drm_connector *connector = state->connectors[i];
> + struct drm_connector *connector = state->connectors[i].ptr;
'ptr' is not a very good name.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
