On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 11:58:27AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 30-05-16 om 11:18 schreef Laurent Pinchart: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > Thank you for the patch. > > > > This looks good to me as the resulting code is mostly similar. However, the > > for_each_*_in_state macros end with an for_each_if() that tests if the > > object's state is NULL, which isn't present in this code. I'm wondering > > whether that was an oversight on my side possibly leading to a crash when > > dereferencing a NULL state, or an unneeded check in the macros. Can > > atomic_state->*_states[i] be NULL if atomic_state->*[i] is not NULL ? > Not in any normal case. Yeah, the drm_atomic_get_*_state functions only ever fill in both of neither. If this gets out of sync it's a bug ;-) -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
