On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 01:16:06PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 01:10:07PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > > On 27/05/16 12:58, Chris Wilson wrote: > > >On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:50:34PM +0300, Marius Vlad wrote: > > >>Signed-off-by: Marius Vlad <marius.c.vlad@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > >Nak. It's a race detector. Please suggest how to increase detection > > >rates. > > > > As a more or less well know TV personality would say - "it's better > > than nothing"! :)) > > > > Seriously, under the new rules this is all we can do. Full > > gem-close-race will (will it?) run in the nightly run so a little > > bit more pain while bisecting breakages but those are the rules. We > > can give them a go and see how it works out. > > Wrong approach. Right approach would be to add a new test that reliably > detected a checklist of the most common races in under 1s. Nerfing a > test to make it useless makes BAT equally useless. > > So we are giving up on BAT? It is a compromise. Either this or nigthly. > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
