Re: [PATCH i-g-t 4/8] tests/gem_close_race: Tune down for BAT ~1s.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 01:10:07PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 27/05/16 12:58, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:50:34PM +0300, Marius Vlad wrote:
> >>Signed-off-by: Marius Vlad <marius.c.vlad@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >Nak. It's a race detector. Please suggest how to increase detection
> >rates.
> 
> As a more or less well know TV personality would say - "it's better
> than nothing"! :))
> 
> Seriously, under the new rules this is all we can do. Full
> gem-close-race will (will it?) run in the nightly run so a little
> bit more pain while bisecting breakages but those are the rules. We
> can give them a go and see how it works out.

Wrong approach. Right approach would be to add a new test that reliably
detected a checklist of the most common races in under 1s. Nerfing a
test to make it useless makes BAT equally useless.

So we are giving up on BAT?
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux