On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 01:10:07PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 27/05/16 12:58, Chris Wilson wrote: > >On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:50:34PM +0300, Marius Vlad wrote: > >>Signed-off-by: Marius Vlad <marius.c.vlad@xxxxxxxxx> > > > >Nak. It's a race detector. Please suggest how to increase detection > >rates. > > As a more or less well know TV personality would say - "it's better > than nothing"! :)) > > Seriously, under the new rules this is all we can do. Full > gem-close-race will (will it?) run in the nightly run so a little > bit more pain while bisecting breakages but those are the rules. We > can give them a go and see how it works out. Wrong approach. Right approach would be to add a new test that reliably detected a checklist of the most common races in under 1s. Nerfing a test to make it useless makes BAT equally useless. So we are giving up on BAT? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
