On ti, 2016-05-24 at 16:18 +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > On ti, 2016-05-24 at 13:02 +0000, Patchwork wrote: > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/gen9: Assume CDCLK PLL > > is off if it's not locked > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/7631/ > > State : failure > > > > == Summary == > > > > Series 7631v1 Series without cover letter > > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/7631/revisions/1/mbox > > > > Test gem_busy: > > Subgroup basic-parallel-vebox: > > dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-skl-i7-6700hq) > > Test gem_exec_basic: > > Subgroup readonly-vebox: > > pass -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq) > > [drm:intel_pipe_update_start [i915]] *ERROR* Potential atomic update failure on pipe A > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95632 > > > Test gem_exec_flush: > > Subgroup basic-batch-kernel-default-cmd: > > pass -> FAIL (ro-byt-n2820) > > Stack trace: > #0 [__igt_fail_assert+0x101] > #1 [gem_execbuf+0x44] > #2 [batch+0x4bd] > #3 [__real_main481+0x308] > #4 [main+0x23] > #5 [__libc_start_main+0xf0] > #6 [_start+0x29] > #7 [+0x29] > child 0 failed with exit status 99 > > (gem_exec_flush:6087) ioctl-wrappers-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, execbuf) == 0 > (gem_exec_flush:6087) ioctl-wrappers-CRITICAL: error: -22 != 0 > Subtest basic-batch-kernel-default-cmd failed. > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95372 > > > Test gem_exec_store: > > Subgroup basic-bsd: > > pass -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq) > > Test gem_ringfill: > > Subgroup basic-default-interruptible: > > dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-skl-i7-6700hq) > > Test gem_storedw_loop: > > Subgroup basic-default: > > dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-skl-i7-6700hq) > > Test kms_pipe_crc_basic: > > Subgroup bad-pipe: > > dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-skl-i7-6700hq) > > Test kms_psr_sink_crc: > > Subgroup psr_basic: > > pass -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq) > > Test kms_setmode: > > Subgroup basic-clone-single-crtc: > > pass -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq) > > Test pm_rpm: > > Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state: > > fail -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq) > > All the remaining WARNs are the above "Potential atomic update failure" > error message, so assuming the same bug as above. I pushed the patchset to -dinq, thanks for the review. > > ro-bdw-i5- > > 5250u total:209 pass:172 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:37 > > ro-bdw-i7- > > 5557U total:209 pass:197 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:12 > > ro-bdw-i7- > > 5600u total:209 pass:180 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:28 > > ro-byt- > > n2820 total:209 pass:169 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:3 skip:37 > > ro-hsw-i3- > > 4010u total:209 pass:186 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 > > ro-hsw-i7- > > 4770r total:209 pass:186 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 > > ro-ilk-i7- > > 620lm total:209 pass:146 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:62 > > ro-ilk1-i5- > > 650 total:204 pass:146 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:57 > > ro-ivb-i7- > > 3770 total:209 pass:177 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32 > > ro-ivb2-i7- > > 3770 total:209 pass:181 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 > > ro-skl-i7-6700hq > > total:204 pass:175 dwarn:8 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 > > ro-snb-i7- > > 2620M total:209 pass:170 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:38 > > > > Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_Patchwork_993/ > > > > 8621fb5 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-05m-23d-18h-18m-33s UTC integration > > manifest > > a416d47 drm/i915/bxt: Sanitize CDCLK to fix breakage during S4 resume > > c1d96b1 drm/i915/gen9: Assume CDCLK PLL is off if it's not locked > > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
