On ti, 2016-05-24 at 13:02 +0000, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: series starting with [v2,1/2] drm/i915/gen9: Assume CDCLK PLL > is off if it's not locked > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/7631/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > Series 7631v1 Series without cover letter > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/7631/revisions/1/mbox > > Test gem_busy: > Subgroup basic-parallel-vebox: > dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-skl-i7-6700hq) > Test gem_exec_basic: > Subgroup readonly-vebox: > pass -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq) [drm:intel_pipe_update_start [i915]] *ERROR* Potential atomic update failure on pipe A https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95632 > Test gem_exec_flush: > Subgroup basic-batch-kernel-default-cmd: > pass -> FAIL (ro-byt-n2820) Stack trace: #0 [__igt_fail_assert+0x101] #1 [gem_execbuf+0x44] #2 [batch+0x4bd] #3 [__real_main481+0x308] #4 [main+0x23] #5 [__libc_start_main+0xf0] #6 [_start+0x29] #7 [<unknown>+0x29] child 0 failed with exit status 99 (gem_exec_flush:6087) ioctl-wrappers-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, execbuf) == 0 (gem_exec_flush:6087) ioctl-wrappers-CRITICAL: error: -22 != 0 Subtest basic-batch-kernel-default-cmd failed. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95372 > Test gem_exec_store: > Subgroup basic-bsd: > pass -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq) > Test gem_ringfill: > Subgroup basic-default-interruptible: > dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-skl-i7-6700hq) > Test gem_storedw_loop: > Subgroup basic-default: > dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-skl-i7-6700hq) > Test kms_pipe_crc_basic: > Subgroup bad-pipe: > dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-skl-i7-6700hq) > Test kms_psr_sink_crc: > Subgroup psr_basic: > pass -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq) > Test kms_setmode: > Subgroup basic-clone-single-crtc: > pass -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq) > Test pm_rpm: > Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state: > fail -> DMESG-WARN (ro-skl-i7-6700hq) All the remaining WARNs are the above "Potential atomic update failure" error message, so assuming the same bug as above. > > ro-bdw-i5- > 5250u total:209 pass:172 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:37 > ro-bdw-i7- > 5557U total:209 pass:197 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:12 > ro-bdw-i7- > 5600u total:209 pass:180 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:28 > ro-byt- > n2820 total:209 pass:169 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:3 skip:37 > ro-hsw-i3- > 4010u total:209 pass:186 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 > ro-hsw-i7- > 4770r total:209 pass:186 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 > ro-ilk-i7- > 620lm total:209 pass:146 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:62 > ro-ilk1-i5- > 650 total:204 pass:146 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:57 > ro-ivb-i7- > 3770 total:209 pass:177 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32 > ro-ivb2-i7- > 3770 total:209 pass:181 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 > ro-skl-i7-6700hq > total:204 pass:175 dwarn:8 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 > ro-snb-i7- > 2620M total:209 pass:170 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:38 > > Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_Patchwork_993/ > > 8621fb5 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-05m-23d-18h-18m-33s UTC integration > manifest > a416d47 drm/i915/bxt: Sanitize CDCLK to fix breakage during S4 resume > c1d96b1 drm/i915/gen9: Assume CDCLK PLL is off if it's not locked > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
