Re: From work_struct to tasklet_struct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 08:48:29AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Just a small set to convert our irq bottom-halves to use a tasklet
> instead of a work_struct. In theory, the tasklet has lower latency
> from the interrupt (or lower upper bound at least), but in practice I
> think it is clearer to be consistent in using tasklets for irq bh.

Forget this since as Ville pointed out, tasklets are softirq and cannot
sleep and we have far too many sleeps for slow hw.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux