On 05/05/16 19:38, Dave Gordon wrote:
On 29/04/2016 16:44, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 27/04/16 19:03, Dave Gordon wrote:
Mostly little optimisations; for instance, if the driver is correctly
following the submission protocol, the "out of space" condition is
impossible, so the previous runtime WARN_ON() is promoted to a
GEM_BUG_ON() for a more dramatic effect in development and less impact
in end-user systems.
Similarly we can replace other WARN_ON() conditions that don't relate to
the hardware state with either BUILD_BUG_ON() for compile-time-
detectable issues, or GEM_BUG_ON() for logical "can't happen" errors.
With those changes, we can convert it to void, as suggested by Chris
Wilson, and update the calling code appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 69
+++++++++++++++---------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h | 3 +-
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
index 6626eff..4d2ea84 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
@@ -470,23 +470,28 @@ int i915_guc_wq_check_space(struct
drm_i915_gem_request *request)
return -EAGAIN;
}
-static int guc_add_workqueue_item(struct i915_guc_client *gc,
- struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
+static void guc_add_workqueue_item(struct i915_guc_client *gc,
+ struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
{
+ /* wqi_len is in DWords, and does not include the one-word
header */
+ const size_t wqi_size = sizeof(struct guc_wq_item);
Again, u32 is correct I think.
Nope, it's a sizeof(), but the compiler will check that it fits in u32
when we convert it to DWords below.
I already wrote in this same thread few days ago this was my oversight.
+ const u32 wqi_len = wqi_size/sizeof(u32) - 1;
struct guc_process_desc *desc;
struct guc_wq_item *wqi;
void *base;
- u32 tail, wq_len, wq_off, space;
+ u32 space, tail, wq_off, wq_page;
desc = gc->client_base + gc->proc_desc_offset;
+
+ /* Space was checked earlier, in i915_guc_wq_check_space() above */
It may be above in the file, but the two do not call one another so I
recommend saying exactly who called it.
I don't really mind who called it, as long as it was called sometime
earlier in the request submission protocol -- the callsite may get moved
around a bit. Use cscope(1) or your favourite IDE to find it.
So what does this comment supposed to tell the reader?
guc_add_workqueue_item does not call i915_guc_wq_check_space so "above"
what? Above in the file? Or maybe *earlier* in the call sequence of
what? Might as well put an useful comment in when you are adding one.
space = CIRC_SPACE(gc->wq_tail, desc->head, gc->wq_size);
- if (WARN_ON(space < sizeof(struct guc_wq_item)))
- return -ENOSPC; /* shouldn't happen */
+ GEM_BUG_ON(space < wqi_size);
It is impossible to hit this only because of the struct_mutex guarding
the whole time window from request creation to submission. If in the
future, near or far, that gets fixed, then this will need reworking.
I don't have any better ideas though.
But a WARN_ON and return would be almost as good. Everything is better
than a dead machine one can't ssh into...
So I appeal to make this a WARN_ON and return. Nothing bad would
happen apart from software thinking GPU has hung.
If the driver violates the sequencing of check+submit then it does
indeed require reworking -- that would be a bug. Hence (GEM_)BUG_ON().
This also was clarified in this same thread few days ago and I conceded
the point.
- /* postincrement WQ tail for next time */
- wq_off = gc->wq_tail;
- gc->wq_tail += sizeof(struct guc_wq_item);
- gc->wq_tail &= gc->wq_size - 1;
+ /* The GuC firmware wants the tail index in QWords, not bytes */
+ tail = rq->tail;
Used to be sampled from rq->ringbuf->tail - are those the same?
It should always have been rq->tail; they're the same at present because
it was copied from ringbuffer as part of the submission process, but it
might not be the same with the scheduler & preemption. So let's get it
right before it becomes a mysterious bug.
+ GEM_BUG_ON(tail & 7);
+ tail >>= 3;
+ GEM_BUG_ON(tail > WQ_RING_TAIL_MAX);
/* For now workqueue item is 4 DWs; workqueue buffer is 2
pages. So we
* should not have the case where structure wqi is across page,
neither
@@ -495,19 +500,23 @@ static int guc_add_workqueue_item(struct
i915_guc_client *gc,
* XXX: if not the case, we need save data to a temp wqi and
copy it to
* workqueue buffer dw by dw.
*/
- WARN_ON(sizeof(struct guc_wq_item) != 16);
- WARN_ON(wq_off & 3);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(wqi_size != 16);
- /* wq starts from the page after doorbell / process_desc */
- base = kmap_atomic(i915_gem_object_get_page(gc->client_obj,
- (wq_off + GUC_DB_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT));
+ /* postincrement WQ tail for next time */
+ wq_off = gc->wq_tail;
+ gc->wq_tail += wqi_size;
+ gc->wq_tail &= gc->wq_size - 1;
+ GEM_BUG_ON(wq_off & (wqi_size - 1));
Use to be wq_off & 3, now is wq_off & 15, which one is correct?
The new one :) I made it more stringent, so we check for correct
alignment of wq_tail to sizeof(queue item), not just DWord.
Worth mentioning in the commit message? Since it begins with "Mostly
little optimisations;" readers/reviewers expect to see no functional
changes then.
+
+ /* WQ starts from the page after doorbell / process_desc */
+ wq_page = (wq_off + GUC_DB_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
wq_off &= PAGE_SIZE - 1;
+ base = kmap_atomic(i915_gem_object_get_page(gc->client_obj,
wq_page));
wqi = (struct guc_wq_item *)((char *)base + wq_off);
- /* len does not include the header */
- wq_len = sizeof(struct guc_wq_item) / sizeof(u32) - 1;
+ /* Now fill in the 4-word work queue item */
wqi->header = WQ_TYPE_INORDER |
- (wq_len << WQ_LEN_SHIFT) |
+ (wqi_len << WQ_LEN_SHIFT) |
(rq->engine->guc_id << WQ_TARGET_SHIFT) |
WQ_NO_WCFLUSH_WAIT;
@@ -515,14 +524,10 @@ static int guc_add_workqueue_item(struct
i915_guc_client *gc,
wqi->context_desc = (u32)intel_lr_context_descriptor(rq->ctx,
rq->engine);
- /* The GuC firmware wants the tail index in QWords, not bytes */
- tail = rq->ringbuf->tail >> 3;
wqi->ring_tail = tail << WQ_RING_TAIL_SHIFT;
- wqi->fence_id = 0; /*XXX: what fence to be here */
+ wqi->fence_id = rq->seqno;
Not mentioned in the commit?
Not actually used either, but I expect it was provided for a Windows
fence ID, so our equivalent is a seqno.
It may show up in a GuC log, in which case seqno provides more helpful
information.
Best to mention it in the commit imho, again, not to confuse
readers/reviewers.
kunmap_atomic(base);
-
- return 0;
}
/**
@@ -537,26 +542,20 @@ int i915_guc_submit(struct drm_i915_gem_request
*rq)
unsigned int engine_id = rq->engine->guc_id;
struct intel_guc *guc = &rq->i915->guc;
struct i915_guc_client *client = guc->execbuf_client;
- int q_ret, b_ret;
+ int b_ret;
What is b_ret out of interest, door*B*ell return code ?
Yes, originally q_ret & b_ret, for return from Queuing and Bellringing,
respectively. Queuing can no longer return an error, but ringing the
doorbell can, even if only in the event of hardware not behaving as
specified.
- q_ret = guc_add_workqueue_item(client, rq);
- if (q_ret == 0)
- b_ret = guc_ring_doorbell(client);
+ guc_add_workqueue_item(client, rq);
+ b_ret = guc_ring_doorbell(client);
client->submissions[engine_id] += 1;
- if (q_ret) {
- client->q_fail += 1;
- client->retcode = q_ret;
- } else if (b_ret) {
+ client->retcode = b_ret;
I wanted to ask for what is this for but then found it is for debugfs.
+ if (b_ret)
client->b_fail += 1;
- client->retcode = q_ret = b_ret;
- } else {
- client->retcode = 0;
- }
+
guc->submissions[engine_id] += 1;
guc->last_seqno[engine_id] = rq->seqno;
- return q_ret;
+ return b_ret;
Could also kill the return value from this one, the only caller,
intel_logical_ring_advance_and_submit does not use it. That function
itself does not look like it needs a return value at the moment. :)
That's really only because we don't have an exit strategy for submission
failure. I would rather see all parts of the submission process able to
return errors (e.g. hardware not responding) and let the top-level code
implement some sort of recovery strategy. Anyway, I'm leaving this here
until someone changes the call signature to void.
}
/*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
index 436f2d6..10e1d5e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ struct i915_guc_client {
/* GuC submission statistics & status */
uint64_t submissions[GUC_MAX_ENGINES_NUM];
uint32_t no_wq_space; /* Space pre-check failed */
- uint32_t q_fail; /* Failed to queue (MBZ) */
+ uint32_t q_fail; /* No longer used */
Get rid of it then?
No, it keeps things aligned. It can be reused for the next thing we need
to add.
AFAIR u32s need to be 4-byte aligned on x86_64 so I don't get it but
whatever.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
