Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915/guc: rework guc_add_workqueue_item()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 27/04/16 19:03, Dave Gordon wrote:
Mostly little optimisations; for instance, if the driver is correctly
following the submission protocol, the "out of space" condition is
impossible, so the previous runtime WARN_ON() is promoted to a
GEM_BUG_ON() for a more dramatic effect in development and less impact
in end-user systems.

Similarly we can replace other WARN_ON() conditions that don't relate to
the hardware state with either BUILD_BUG_ON() for compile-time-
detectable issues, or GEM_BUG_ON() for logical "can't happen" errors.

With those changes, we can convert it to void, as suggested by Chris
Wilson, and update the calling code appropriately.

Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 69 +++++++++++++++---------------
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h           |  2 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h      |  3 +-
  3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
index 6626eff..4d2ea84 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
@@ -470,23 +470,28 @@ int i915_guc_wq_check_space(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
  	return -EAGAIN;
  }

-static int guc_add_workqueue_item(struct i915_guc_client *gc,
-				  struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
+static void guc_add_workqueue_item(struct i915_guc_client *gc,
+				   struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
  {
+	/* wqi_len is in DWords, and does not include the one-word header */
+	const size_t wqi_size = sizeof(struct guc_wq_item);

Again, u32 is correct I think.

+	const u32 wqi_len = wqi_size/sizeof(u32) - 1;
  	struct guc_process_desc *desc;
  	struct guc_wq_item *wqi;
  	void *base;
-	u32 tail, wq_len, wq_off, space;
+	u32 space, tail, wq_off, wq_page;

  	desc = gc->client_base + gc->proc_desc_offset;
+
+	/* Space was checked earlier, in i915_guc_wq_check_space() above */

It may be above in the file, but the two do not call one another so I recommend saying exactly who called it.

  	space = CIRC_SPACE(gc->wq_tail, desc->head, gc->wq_size);
-	if (WARN_ON(space < sizeof(struct guc_wq_item)))
-		return -ENOSPC; /* shouldn't happen */
+	GEM_BUG_ON(space < wqi_size);

It is impossible to hit this only because of the struct_mutex guarding the whole time window from request creation to submission. If in the future, near or far, that gets fixed, then this will need reworking.

I don't have any better ideas though.

But a WARN_ON and return would be almost as good. Everything is better than a dead machine one can't ssh into...

So I appeal to make this a WARN_ON and return. Nothing bad would happen apart from software thinking GPU has hung.


-	/* postincrement WQ tail for next time */
-	wq_off = gc->wq_tail;
-	gc->wq_tail += sizeof(struct guc_wq_item);
-	gc->wq_tail &= gc->wq_size - 1;
+	/* The GuC firmware wants the tail index in QWords, not bytes */
+	tail = rq->tail;

Used to be sampled from rq->ringbuf->tail - are those the same?

+	GEM_BUG_ON(tail & 7);
+	tail >>= 3;
+	GEM_BUG_ON(tail > WQ_RING_TAIL_MAX);

  	/* For now workqueue item is 4 DWs; workqueue buffer is 2 pages. So we
  	 * should not have the case where structure wqi is across page, neither
@@ -495,19 +500,23 @@ static int guc_add_workqueue_item(struct i915_guc_client *gc,
  	 * XXX: if not the case, we need save data to a temp wqi and copy it to
  	 * workqueue buffer dw by dw.
  	 */
-	WARN_ON(sizeof(struct guc_wq_item) != 16);
-	WARN_ON(wq_off & 3);
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(wqi_size != 16);

-	/* wq starts from the page after doorbell / process_desc */
-	base = kmap_atomic(i915_gem_object_get_page(gc->client_obj,
-			(wq_off + GUC_DB_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT));
+	/* postincrement WQ tail for next time */
+	wq_off = gc->wq_tail;
+	gc->wq_tail += wqi_size;
+	gc->wq_tail &= gc->wq_size - 1;
+	GEM_BUG_ON(wq_off & (wqi_size - 1));

Use to be wq_off & 3, now is wq_off & 15, which one is correct?

+
+	/* WQ starts from the page after doorbell / process_desc */
+	wq_page = (wq_off + GUC_DB_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
  	wq_off &= PAGE_SIZE - 1;
+	base = kmap_atomic(i915_gem_object_get_page(gc->client_obj, wq_page));
  	wqi = (struct guc_wq_item *)((char *)base + wq_off);

-	/* len does not include the header */
-	wq_len = sizeof(struct guc_wq_item) / sizeof(u32) - 1;
+	/* Now fill in the 4-word work queue item */
  	wqi->header = WQ_TYPE_INORDER |
-			(wq_len << WQ_LEN_SHIFT) |
+			(wqi_len << WQ_LEN_SHIFT) |
  			(rq->engine->guc_id << WQ_TARGET_SHIFT) |
  			WQ_NO_WCFLUSH_WAIT;

@@ -515,14 +524,10 @@ static int guc_add_workqueue_item(struct i915_guc_client *gc,
  	wqi->context_desc = (u32)intel_lr_context_descriptor(rq->ctx,
  							     rq->engine);

-	/* The GuC firmware wants the tail index in QWords, not bytes */
-	tail = rq->ringbuf->tail >> 3;
  	wqi->ring_tail = tail << WQ_RING_TAIL_SHIFT;
-	wqi->fence_id = 0; /*XXX: what fence to be here */
+	wqi->fence_id = rq->seqno;

Not mentioned in the commit?


  	kunmap_atomic(base);
-
-	return 0;
  }

  /**
@@ -537,26 +542,20 @@ int i915_guc_submit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq)
  	unsigned int engine_id = rq->engine->guc_id;
  	struct intel_guc *guc = &rq->i915->guc;
  	struct i915_guc_client *client = guc->execbuf_client;
-	int q_ret, b_ret;
+	int b_ret;

What is b_ret out of interest, door*B*ell return code ?


-	q_ret = guc_add_workqueue_item(client, rq);
-	if (q_ret == 0)
-		b_ret = guc_ring_doorbell(client);
+	guc_add_workqueue_item(client, rq);
+	b_ret = guc_ring_doorbell(client);

  	client->submissions[engine_id] += 1;
-	if (q_ret) {
-		client->q_fail += 1;
-		client->retcode = q_ret;
-	} else if (b_ret) {
+	client->retcode = b_ret;

I wanted to ask for what is this for but then found it is for debugfs.

+	if (b_ret)
  		client->b_fail += 1;
-		client->retcode = q_ret = b_ret;
-	} else {
-		client->retcode = 0;
-	}
+
  	guc->submissions[engine_id] += 1;
  	guc->last_seqno[engine_id] = rq->seqno;

-	return q_ret;
+	return b_ret;

Could also kill the return value from this one, the only caller, intel_logical_ring_advance_and_submit does not use it. That function itself does not look like it needs a return value at the moment. :)

  }

  /*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
index 436f2d6..10e1d5e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ struct i915_guc_client {
  	/* GuC submission statistics & status */
  	uint64_t submissions[GUC_MAX_ENGINES_NUM];
  	uint32_t no_wq_space;		/* Space pre-check failed	*/
-	uint32_t q_fail;		/* Failed to queue (MBZ)	*/
+	uint32_t q_fail;		/* No longer used		*/

Get rid of it then?

  	uint32_t b_fail;		/* Doorbell failure (MBZ)	*/
  	int retcode;			/* Result of last guc_submit()	*/
  };
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h
index 2de57ff..944786d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h
@@ -71,7 +71,8 @@
  #define   WQ_WORKLOAD_TOUCH		(2 << WQ_WORKLOAD_SHIFT)

  #define WQ_RING_TAIL_SHIFT		20
-#define WQ_RING_TAIL_MASK		(0x7FF << WQ_RING_TAIL_SHIFT)
+#define WQ_RING_TAIL_MAX		0x7FF	/* 2^11 QWords */
+#define WQ_RING_TAIL_MASK		(WQ_RING_TAIL_MAX << WQ_RING_TAIL_SHIFT)

  #define GUC_DOORBELL_ENABLED		1
  #define GUC_DOORBELL_DISABLED		0


Regards,

Tvrtko

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux