On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:07:41AM -0400, Robert Foss wrote:
>
>
> On 04/28/2016 04:02 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:08:35PM -0400, Robert Foss wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>On 04/26/2016 01:00 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:55:54PM -0400, Robert Foss wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>On 04/26/2016 10:11 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>>>>On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 05:25:00PM -0400, robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>>>>>From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Add support for DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_LVDS and DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DSI
> >>>>>>connectors.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>---
> >>>>>> tests/kms_panel_fitting.c | 12 +++++++++---
> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>diff --git a/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c b/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c
> >>>>>>index 60a22b0..933776c 100644
> >>>>>>--- a/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c
> >>>>>>+++ b/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c
> >>>>>>@@ -140,9 +140,15 @@ static void test_panel_fitting(data_t *d)
> >>>>>> for_each_connected_output(display, output) {
> >>>>>> drmModeModeInfo *mode, native_mode;
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>- if (output->config.connector->connector_type !=
> >>>>>>- DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP)
> >>>>>>- continue;
> >>>>>>+ switch (output->config.connector->connector_type)
> >>>>>>+ {
> >>>>>>+ case DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_LVDS:
> >>>>>>+ case DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP:
> >>>>>>+ case DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DSI:
> >>>>>>+ break;
> >>>>>>+ default:
> >>>>>>+ continue;
> >>>>>>+ }
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I think ville commented that we should instead check for "scaling mode",
> >>>>>and we discussed this on irc. Am I accidentally looking at an old patch
> >>>>>series?
> >>>>>-Daniel
> >>>>>
> >>>>No, this isn't an old patch, I misunderstood where our conversation ended.
> >>>>
> >>>>"scaling mode" is an intel specific extension as far as I understand it,
> >>>>which is somewhat the opposite of generalizing i-g-t tests.
> >>>>
> >>>>Is there an architecture independent way forward?
> >>>
> >>>A quick poke at cscope tells me "scaling mode" is used by amdgpu, gma500,
> >>>i915, nouveau, and radeon. Seems fairly independent to me.
> >>>
> >>If that is the case, and it seems to be, "scaling mode" is definitely
> >>worth pursuing.
> >
> >Perhaps also send in a kernel patch to update the docbook table? It's
> >awful, but the best thing we have right now ...
> >-Daniel
> >
>
> Other than a Description/Restrictions entry for "scaling mode", is there
> anything you'd like to see added?
I meant moving it into the generic section and list which drivers support
it. No need to change the description itself - that's an entire project on
itself.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
