On 04/26/2016 10:11 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 05:25:00PM -0400, robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Add support for DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_LVDS and DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DSI connectors. Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- tests/kms_panel_fitting.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c b/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c index 60a22b0..933776c 100644 --- a/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c +++ b/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c @@ -140,9 +140,15 @@ static void test_panel_fitting(data_t *d) for_each_connected_output(display, output) { drmModeModeInfo *mode, native_mode; - if (output->config.connector->connector_type != - DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP) - continue; + switch (output->config.connector->connector_type) + { + case DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_LVDS: + case DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP: + case DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DSI: + break; + default: + continue; + }I think ville commented that we should instead check for "scaling mode", and we discussed this on irc. Am I accidentally looking at an old patch series? -Daniel
No, this isn't an old patch, I misunderstood where our conversation ended. "scaling mode" is an intel specific extension as far as I understand it, which is somewhat the opposite of generalizing i-g-t tests. Is there an architecture independent way forward?
pipe = output->config.pipe; igt_output_set_pipe(output, pipe); -- 2.5.0
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
