Grr, both of them take 2minutes, 1 minute each. What I meant was 30s each. Got distracted a little bit, that the duration is adjusted to ms further down the call. On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:23:26AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 08:49:57PM +0300, Marius Vlad wrote: > > basic-flip-vs-dpms and basic-flip-vs-modeset together take roughly 2m > > to run. Adjust the duration time to a maximum of 500ms. > > Can we have a notch more please? Ime it takes generally a few modesets for > this thing to fall over (2-3 modesets), are you sure the test still does > something useful in half a second? Mostly a modeset takes a lot longer > than that. Definitely not half a second... > > Also you just half the duration, but claim it goes from 2minutes to 500 ms > ... > > I'm confused. > -Daniel > > > > > Signed-off-by: Marius Vlad <marius.c.vlad@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > tests/kms_flip.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/tests/kms_flip.c b/tests/kms_flip.c > > index 3d44544..fd8206f 100644 > > --- a/tests/kms_flip.c > > +++ b/tests/kms_flip.c > > @@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ static int run_test(int duration, int flags) > > } > > > > igt_require(modes); > > - duration = duration * 1000 / modes; > > + duration = duration * 500 / modes; > > duration = max(500, duration); > > > > /* Find any connected displays */ > > -- > > 2.5.0 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > http://blog.ffwll.ch
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
