On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 03:00:23PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > Refer to the GGTT VM consistently as "ggtt_vm" instead of just "ggtt", > "vm" or indirectly through other variables like "dev_priv->ggtt.base" > to avoid confusion with the i915_ggtt object itself and PPGTT VMs. On the one hand, yes it seems more fitting to call it ggtt_vm. On the other, we've been pretty consistent in calling the address space ggtt! And I like the look of ggtt far more than ggtt_vm. Killing off more mixed dev_priv->ggtt.base and ggtt pointer usage is definitely good though. But I'm ambivalent about the whole. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
