On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 16/03/16 15:40, Ville Syrjälä wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 03:35:13PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 16/03/16 15:01, Patchwork wrote: >>>> >>>> == Series Details == >>>> >>>> Series: series starting with [1/5] drm/i915: Rename local struct >>>> intel_engine_cs variables >>>> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/4508/ >>>> State : failure >>>> >>>> == Summary == >>>> >>>> Series 4508v1 Series without cover letter >>>> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/4508/revisions/1/mbox/ >>>> >>>> Test drv_module_reload_basic: >>>> skip -> PASS (bdw-nuci7) >>>> Test kms_flip: >>>> Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank: >>>> pass -> FAIL (ivb-t430s) >>> >>> >>> Unrelated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94294 >> >> >> I'd like people to add a bit more information to these analysis mails. >> If there's just the bugzilla link I actually have to open it before >> I can see what the problem was. Makes it harder to keep on top what >> the most common BAT problems are. > > > Yeah in principle I agree but some of these are the usual suspects which > have been dragging for so long it would take an iron will (or something > nastier) to keep repeating the same analysis over and over again. Someone is asking for a really nasty maintainer to provide motivation? More seriously&honestly I'm not entirely sure how we can get out of this "CI seems constantly broken" place :( -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
