On 16/03/16 15:40, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 03:35:13PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 16/03/16 15:01, Patchwork wrote:
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [1/5] drm/i915: Rename local struct intel_engine_cs variables
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/4508/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Series 4508v1 Series without cover letter
http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/4508/revisions/1/mbox/
Test drv_module_reload_basic:
skip -> PASS (bdw-nuci7)
Test kms_flip:
Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank:
pass -> FAIL (ivb-t430s)
Unrelated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94294
I'd like people to add a bit more information to these analysis mails.
If there's just the bugzilla link I actually have to open it before
I can see what the problem was. Makes it harder to keep on top what
the most common BAT problems are.
Yeah in principle I agree but some of these are the usual suspects which
have been dragging for so long it would take an iron will (or something
nastier) to keep repeating the same analysis over and over again.
Sometimes I remember and add a link to new CI logs to the relevant BZ
instance which is probably more useful for people looking at BAT marked
entries (which are all critical anyway) to gather enough data points
when debugging.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
