On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 14:54 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 02:40:44PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 14:39 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > Don't forget to call dirtyfb then. > > Are you talking about frontbuffer rendering, or pageflipping > > between > > two dumb buffers? > Afaik, no one yet tracks damage on a backbuffer before a flip. But we > don't constrain the tests to backbuffer as we do need to exercise > frontbuffer rendering and iirc those tests all use set-domain. I > don't > see any PSR/FBC testing using the dumb framebuffers... Or is the dumb > framebuffer purely a backbuffer + flip model? Right, Weston strictly uses pageflipping, because frontbuffer rendering isn't pretty. xf86-video-modesetting uses frontbuffer rendering, and does DirtyFB. So I'd say that's our ABI. Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
