On 02/24/2016 10:53 PM, Jindal, Sonika wrote: > Hi Joe, > > Yes, first thing to try is to increase the tries. We testing with 300 retries, but the second monitor still did not show up. However, it did show up in lspci. > Can you please point me to the bug and provide more details like platform, monitor, cable. The bug is at: http://pad.lv/1543683 . All the hardware details should be in the bug report. The cable is a single link dvi-d cable. Unfortunately the bug reporter does not have a dual link cable to test. If you need any additional info, we can ask the bug reporter. > Are you referring to the same issue as Oleksandr reported where a single link dvi/hdmi cable didn’t work and dual link worked? I'm not sure if this is the exact issue or not. I'll review the other thread and compare. > > Regards, > Sonika > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joseph Salisbury [mailto:joseph.salisbury@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 3:09 AM > To: Jindal, Sonika <sonika.jindal@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Sharma, Shashank <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>; Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>; Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>; Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>; intel-gfx <intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; dri-devel <dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [4.4-rc1][Regression] drm/i915: Check live status before reading edid > > Hi Sonika, > > A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug: > > commit 237ed86c693d8a8e4db476976aeb30df4deac74b > Author: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue Sep 15 09:44:20 2015 +0530 > > drm/i915: Check live status before reading edid > > > > The regression was introduced as of v4.4-rc1. > > I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author. Do think increasing the number of tries in intel_hdmi_detect() is worth trying? Do you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue, or would it be best to submit a revert request? > > > Thanks, > > Joe > > [0] http://pad.lv/lp1543683 > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
