On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 01:45:03PM -0000, Patchwork wrote: > == Summary == > > Series 3541v1 drm/i915: Some FDI related dotclock stuff > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/3541/revisions/1/mbox/ > > Test kms_flip: > Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms: > dmesg-warn -> PASS (ilk-hp8440p) UNSTABLE > Subgroup basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank: > pass -> FAIL (snb-x220t) (kms_flip:6443) DEBUG: name = vblank last_ts = 594.687318 usec last_received_ts = 594.687142 usec last_seq = 24682 current_ts = 594.870400 usec current_received_ts = 594.870267 usec current_seq = 24692 count = 44 seq_step = 10 (kms_flip:6443) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_state, file kms_flip.c:692: (kms_flip:6443) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: fabs((((double) diff.tv_usec) - usec_interflip) / usec_interflip) <= 0.005 (kms_flip:6443) CRITICAL: Last errno: 25, Inappropriate ioctl for device (kms_flip:6443) CRITICAL: inter-vblank ts jitter: 0s, 183082usec Hmm. So here it looks like the seq number says 10, but the timestamp difference says 11. I found a few more of the same in the CI results. This could be due to the race with even numbered vblank seq increments that could be fixed by: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2015-September/090288.html Filed a bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94294 > Test kms_pipe_crc_basic: > Subgroup read-crc-pipe-b: > pass -> INCOMPLETE (ilk-hp8440p) > Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-a: > dmesg-warn -> PASS (skl-i5k-2) UNSTABLE > Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b: > pass -> DMESG-WARN (skl-i5k-2) UNSTABLE > Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-c: > dmesg-warn -> PASS (bsw-nuc-2) > Test pm_rpm: > Subgroup basic-pci-d3-state: > dmesg-warn -> PASS (bsw-nuc-2) > pass -> DMESG-WARN (byt-nuc) [ 126.296996] [drm:intel_runtime_suspend [i915]] *ERROR* Unclaimed access detected prior to suspending https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94164 > Subgroup basic-rte: > pass -> DMESG-WARN (bsw-nuc-2) > pass -> FAIL (bdw-ultra) https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94163 > dmesg-warn -> PASS (byt-nuc) UNSTABLE > > bdw-nuci7 total:164 pass:153 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:11 > bdw-ultra total:167 pass:152 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:14 > bsw-nuc-2 total:167 pass:136 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30 > byt-nuc total:167 pass:141 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:25 > hsw-gt2 total:167 pass:156 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:10 > ilk-hp8440p total:163 pass:114 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:47 > ivb-t430s total:167 pass:152 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:14 > skl-i5k-2 total:167 pass:150 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16 > snb-dellxps total:167 pass:144 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:22 > snb-x220t total:167 pass:143 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:3 skip:21 > > Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1429/ > > 631053ba117c294f0cdfe704718a040b4406a240 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-02m-17d-21h-05m-38s UTC integration manifest > beb6d5046d6b0eafd0aa4bc15a87e534e3e0aa8e drm/i915: Try to fix CRT port clock limits > c7f53fb3c57d5a91216c037d757876e3a692ae0e drm/i915: Read out VGA dotclock properly on LPT > 3c2e8606fb856686e2fa84b10f1c22ef2d209e17 drm/i915: Make the LPT iclkip 20MHz case more generic > 6bb0fff788112afbb60391b5a77e4f62745ba0f7 drm/i915: Remove the SPLL==270Mhz assumption from intel_fdi_link_freq() > f8260170eff5e4763d1c99e1baa3246f19c294d5 drm/i915: Move the encoder vs. FDI dotclock check out from encoder .get_config() > 865134f99bff4ba3a91d2703282aa16c83d8ce52 drm/i915: Dump ddi_pll_sel in hex instead of decimal on HSW/BDW -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
