On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 11:28 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Feb 2016, Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > We need to enable DSI PLL before configuring the DSI registers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> > index 91cef35..378f879 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> > @@ -478,8 +478,8 @@ static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> >
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
> >
> > - intel_dsi_prepare(encoder);
> > intel_enable_dsi_pll(encoder);
> > + intel_dsi_prepare(encoder);
>
> I'd really like to have this tested on BYT/CHV DSI to ensure we're not
> breaking anything.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
We have CI results for this. Should we be worried about CPU fifo
underrun?
http://benchsrv.fi.intel.com/archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1344/
>
>
> >
> > /* Panel Enable over CRC PMIC */
> > if (intel_dsi->gpio_panel)
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
