Re: [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915: Add wait_for_us

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/02/16 11:06, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>

This is for callers who want micro-second precision but are not
waiting from the atomic context.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c  | 3 +--
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 9 +++++----
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 2 +-
  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index e2bea710614f..fb8a76ec6ade 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -1788,11 +1788,10 @@ static void wait_panel_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
  			I915_READ(pp_stat_reg),
  			I915_READ(pp_ctrl_reg));

-	if (_wait_for((I915_READ(pp_stat_reg) & mask) == value, 5000, 10)) {
+	if (_wait_for((I915_READ(pp_stat_reg) & mask) == value, 5000000, 10000))
  		DRM_ERROR("Panel status timeout: status %08x control %08x\n",
  				I915_READ(pp_stat_reg),
  				I915_READ(pp_ctrl_reg));
-	}

  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Wait complete\n");
  }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index f620023ed134..779d17a9fcce 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -45,8 +45,8 @@
   * having timed out, since the timeout could be due to preemption or similar and
   * we've never had a chance to check the condition before the timeout.
   */
-#define _wait_for(COND, MS, W) ({ \
-	unsigned long timeout__ = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MS) + 1;	\
+#define _wait_for(COND, US, W) ({ \
+	unsigned long timeout__ = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(US) + 1;	\
  	int ret__ = 0;							\
  	while (!(COND)) {						\
  		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout__)) {			\
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
  			break;						\
  		}							\
  		if ((W) && drm_can_sleep()) {				\
-			usleep_range((W)*1000, (W)*2000);		\
+			usleep_range((W), (W)*2);			\
  		} else {						\
  			cpu_relax();					\
  		}							\
@@ -63,7 +63,8 @@
  	ret__;								\
  })

-#define wait_for(COND, MS) _wait_for(COND, MS, 1)
+#define wait_for(COND, MS) _wait_for(COND, (MS) * 1000, 1000)
+#define wait_for_us(COND, US) _wait_for(COND, US, 1)
  #define wait_for_atomic(COND, MS) _wait_for(COND, MS, 0)
  #define wait_for_atomic_us(COND, US) _wait_for((COND), \
  					       DIV_ROUND_UP((US), 1000), 0)

Don't these latter two macros need to be altered since the underlying _wait_for() now takes times in us rather than ms?

.Dave.

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index 9ccff3011523..e12377963839 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ static void hsw_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)

  		/* Wait till PSR is idle */
  		if (_wait_for((I915_READ(EDP_PSR_STATUS_CTL) &
-			       EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK) == 0, 2000, 10))
+			       EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK) == 0, 2000000, 10000))
  			DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle State\n");

  		dev_priv->psr.active = false;


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux