On 27/01/2016 11:33, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 05:52:51PM +0000, Arun Siluvery wrote:
Revision id along with device id is useful in better identification of the HW
and its limitations so include this detail in error state.
Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
index 7eeb244..f3ddc3b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
@@ -365,6 +365,7 @@ int i915_error_state_to_str(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
err_printf(m, "Reset count: %u\n", error->reset_count);
err_printf(m, "Suspend count: %u\n", error->suspend_count);
err_printf(m, "PCI ID: 0x%04x\n", dev->pdev->device);
+ err_printf(m, "Revision: 0x%02x\n", dev->pdev->revision);
"PCI revision" maybe?
sure, makes it more clear.
regards
Arun
err_printf(m, "IOMMU enabled?: %d\n", error->iommu);
if (HAS_CSR(dev)) {
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
