On 1/26/2016 3:36 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 08:43:33AM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
== Summary ==
Built on 8fe9e785ae04fa7c37f7935cff12d62e38054b60 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-01m-21d-11h-02m-42s UTC integration manifest
Test gem_ctx_basic:
pass -> FAIL (bdw-ultra)
This is another 'returncode -15'. I think that's just some piglit
fail or something. I think it would indicate someone sent a SIGTERM to
the test. Not sure why that would happen. Some timeout perhaps?
This might be a false alarm as changes between v4 and v5 is just a
static keyword removal and that shouldn't cause timeout to happen.
V4 results seems to be fine. Shall we ignore this? Is there any way to
rerun the tests apart from pushing patch again or debug this in case?
Test kms_flip:
Subgroup basic-flip-vs-dpms:
pass -> DMESG-WARN (ilk-hp8440p)
And that's the ilk underrrun thing:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93787
bdw-nuci7 total:140 pass:131 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:9
bdw-ultra total:143 pass:136 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:6
bsw-nuc-2 total:143 pass:119 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24
byt-nuc total:143 pass:128 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:15
hsw-brixbox total:143 pass:136 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:7
hsw-gt2 total:143 pass:139 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:4
ilk-hp8440p total:143 pass:103 dwarn:2 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:38
ivb-t430s total:143 pass:137 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:6
skl-i5k-2 total:143 pass:134 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:8
snb-dellxps total:143 pass:129 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
snb-x220t total:143 pass:129 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:13
Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_1256/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
