2016-01-26 11:40 GMT-02:00 Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:28:59AM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> The big motivation behind this patch is that the current power-of-two >> granularity from igt_fb is way too big. There was more than one >> occasion where I had to work around this problem on >> kms_frontbuffer_tracking, and during my last workaround I was >> requested to just make igt_fb use more minimal buffers. >> >> I also need to export the size computation function so I won't need to >> reimplement it inside kms_frontbuffer_tracking. >> >> v2: >> - Fix the Yf sizes (Ville). >> - Don't change the non-tiled Gen 2/3 behavior. > > s/non-tiled/tiled/ We're now not-changing both. v1 was wrongly changing gen 2/3 non-tiled behavior by treating it as tiled. v2 fixed that, so now we're not changing both tiled and non-tiled behavior > > You made me panic. I can see the confusion. I'll change the wording before pushing. > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Paulo Zanoni _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
