On 25/01/16 16:28, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 01:07:48PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 22/01/16 12:19, Dave Gordon wrote:
In the error-handling paths of i915_gem_do_execbuffer() and
intel_crtc_page_flip(), the local pointer-to-request variables
were expected to be either valid pointers or NULL. Since
2682708 drm/i915: simplify allocation of driver-internal requests
they could also be ERR_PTR() values, so the tests need to be
updated to accommodate this case.
Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Not sure if CI will pick up a new patch in an old series.
I think it'll treat this one as a replacement for patch 1/4 and then ofc
totally fall over. So would need a resend of the entire pile.
The rest of the pile has been merged already so I think just this patch
on its own then (not as in-reply-to anything).
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
