On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 02:08:32PM +0000, Arun Siluvery wrote: > On 22/01/2016 13:59, Chris Wilson wrote: > >On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 02:32:32AM +0100, Tomas Elf wrote: > >>Final enablement patch for GPU hang recovery using watchdog timeout. > >>Added execbuf flag for watchdog timeout in DRM kernel interface. > > > >Usual argument: per-batch or per-context flag? What's the use case being > >consider that would favour one approach or another. That usecase should > >be explained in the changelog so that we can be reminded of it again > >later. > > It is per-batch, user expects certain workloads to be completed before > watchdog times out hence it is per-batch. > This is mainly used for media workloads, don't know the exact usecase but I > guess encode/decode work of frame to complete within a short time etc. I > will add these details to commit msg. Usual reminder: We need an open-source user to get these new interfaces in. Looking at that should make it pretty clear whether the watchdog should be per-ctx or per-batch. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
