On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 05:53:29PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 06:26:08PM -0800, tom.orourke@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Tom O'Rourke <Tom.O'Rourke@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > When frequency requests are made by SLPC, host driver > > should not attempt to make frequency requests due to > > potential conflicts. > > > > Host-based turbo operations are already avoided when > > SLPC is used. This change covers other frequency > > requests such as from sysfs or debugfs interfaces. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tom O'Rourke <Tom.O'Rourke@xxxxxxxxx> > > Does this break the sysfs interface, i.e. can userspace still set limits > when SLPC is in use? Ah found the sysfs control bits later on in the series. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
