On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 08:14:34PM +0000, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote: > Em Ter, 2016-01-19 às 14:50 +0000, Patchwork escreveu: > > == Summary == > > > > Built on 20c388faff9d8c41ab27e825c685526561b892a2 drm-intel-nightly: > > 2016y-01m-19d-13h-31m-46s UTC integration manifest > > > > Test kms_flip: > > Subgroup basic-flip-vs-modeset: > > pass -> DMESG-WARN (skl-i5k-2) > > The dmesg warn is the following: > > [ 273.515394] [drm:gen8_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* The master control > interrupt lied (DE PIPE)! > > I coulnd't find anything showing that this error was present before the > patch series, but I also can't reproduce it on my SKL machine and I > find it hard to believe that this error was introduced by any of the > patches in question. > > So, with the new rules, how do I proceed here? I'm sure we can be pragmatic here. We've seen that one before, at least on BDW. > If the series was shorter I'd just resubmit and see if the RNG allows > me to pass, but sending 25 patches again won't be cool. It would be > good to have a way to ask the CI to run the failed subtests again on > the same patch series in order to confirm things. Right, that's indeed a feature that is planned, while I'd like to finish other things first, I guess it's simple enough that I can bump the priority a bit. -- Damien _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
