The generic interval tree we use to speed up range invalidation is an
augmented rbtree that can report all overlapping intervals for a given
range. Therefore we do not need to degrade to a linear list if we find
overlapping objects. Oops.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c | 181 +++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
index 59e45b3a6937..7107f2fd38f5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
@@ -49,21 +49,18 @@ struct i915_mmu_notifier {
struct hlist_node node;
struct mmu_notifier mn;
struct rb_root objects;
- struct list_head linear;
- bool has_linear;
};
struct i915_mmu_object {
struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn;
+ struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
struct interval_tree_node it;
struct list_head link;
- struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
struct work_struct work;
- bool active;
- bool is_linear;
+ bool attached;
};
-static void __cancel_userptr__worker(struct work_struct *work)
+static void cancel_userptr(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct i915_mmu_object *mo = container_of(work, typeof(*mo), work);
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = mo->obj;
@@ -94,24 +91,22 @@ static void __cancel_userptr__worker(struct work_struct *work)
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
}
-static unsigned long cancel_userptr(struct i915_mmu_object *mo)
+static void add_object(struct i915_mmu_object *mo)
{
- unsigned long end = mo->obj->userptr.ptr + mo->obj->base.size;
-
- /* The mmu_object is released late when destroying the
- * GEM object so it is entirely possible to gain a
- * reference on an object in the process of being freed
- * since our serialisation is via the spinlock and not
- * the struct_mutex - and consequently use it after it
- * is freed and then double free it.
- */
- if (mo->active && kref_get_unless_zero(&mo->obj->base.refcount)) {
- schedule_work(&mo->work);
- /* only schedule one work packet to avoid the refleak */
- mo->active = false;
- }
+ if (mo->attached)
+ return;
+
+ interval_tree_insert(&mo->it, &mo->mn->objects);
+ mo->attached = true;
+}
- return end;
+static void del_object(struct i915_mmu_object *mo)
+{
+ if (!mo->attached)
+ return;
+
+ interval_tree_remove(&mo->it, &mo->mn->objects);
+ mo->attached = false;
}
static void i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn,
@@ -122,28 +117,36 @@ static void i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *_mn,
struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn =
container_of(_mn, struct i915_mmu_notifier, mn);
struct i915_mmu_object *mo;
+ struct interval_tree_node *it;
+ LIST_HEAD(cancelled);
+
+ if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&mn->objects))
+ return;
/* interval ranges are inclusive, but invalidate range is exclusive */
end--;
spin_lock(&mn->lock);
- if (mn->has_linear) {
- list_for_each_entry(mo, &mn->linear, link) {
- if (mo->it.last < start || mo->it.start > end)
- continue;
-
- cancel_userptr(mo);
- }
- } else {
- struct interval_tree_node *it;
+ it = interval_tree_iter_first(&mn->objects, start, end);
+ while (it) {
+ /* The mmu_object is released late when destroying the
+ * GEM object so it is entirely possible to gain a
+ * reference on an object in the process of being freed
+ * since our serialisation is via the spinlock and not
+ * the struct_mutex - and consequently use it after it
+ * is freed and then double free it. To prevent that
+ * use-after-free we only acquire a reference on the
+ * object if it is not in the process of being destroyed.
+ */
+ mo = container_of(it, struct i915_mmu_object, it);
+ if (kref_get_unless_zero(&mo->obj->base.refcount))
+ schedule_work(&mo->work);
- it = interval_tree_iter_first(&mn->objects, start, end);
- while (it) {
- mo = container_of(it, struct i915_mmu_object, it);
- start = cancel_userptr(mo);
- it = interval_tree_iter_next(it, start, end);
- }
+ list_add(&mo->link, &cancelled);
+ it = interval_tree_iter_next(it, start, end);
}
+ list_for_each_entry(mo, &cancelled, link)
+ del_object(mo);
spin_unlock(&mn->lock);
}
@@ -164,8 +167,6 @@ i915_mmu_notifier_create(struct mm_struct *mm)
spin_lock_init(&mn->lock);
mn->mn.ops = &i915_gem_userptr_notifier;
mn->objects = RB_ROOT;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mn->linear);
- mn->has_linear = false;
/* Protected by mmap_sem (write-lock) */
ret = __mmu_notifier_register(&mn->mn, mm);
@@ -177,85 +178,6 @@ i915_mmu_notifier_create(struct mm_struct *mm)
return mn;
}
-static int
-i915_mmu_notifier_add(struct drm_device *dev,
- struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn,
- struct i915_mmu_object *mo)
-{
- struct interval_tree_node *it;
- int ret = 0;
-
- /* By this point we have already done a lot of expensive setup that
- * we do not want to repeat just because the caller (e.g. X) has a
- * signal pending (and partly because of that expensive setup, X
- * using an interrupt timer is likely to get stuck in an EINTR loop).
- */
- mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-
- /* Make sure we drop the final active reference (and thereby
- * remove the objects from the interval tree) before we do
- * the check for overlapping objects.
- */
- i915_gem_retire_requests(dev);
-
- spin_lock(&mn->lock);
- it = interval_tree_iter_first(&mn->objects,
- mo->it.start, mo->it.last);
- if (it) {
- struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
-
- /* We only need to check the first object in the range as it
- * either has cancelled gup work queued and we need to
- * return back to the user to give time for the gup-workers
- * to flush their object references upon which the object will
- * be removed from the interval-tree, or the the range is
- * still in use by another client and the overlap is invalid.
- *
- * If we do have an overlap, we cannot use the interval tree
- * for fast range invalidation.
- */
-
- obj = container_of(it, struct i915_mmu_object, it)->obj;
- if (!obj->userptr.workers)
- mn->has_linear = mo->is_linear = true;
- else
- ret = -EAGAIN;
- } else
- interval_tree_insert(&mo->it, &mn->objects);
-
- if (ret == 0)
- list_add(&mo->link, &mn->linear);
-
- spin_unlock(&mn->lock);
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-
- return ret;
-}
-
-static bool i915_mmu_notifier_has_linear(struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn)
-{
- struct i915_mmu_object *mo;
-
- list_for_each_entry(mo, &mn->linear, link)
- if (mo->is_linear)
- return true;
-
- return false;
-}
-
-static void
-i915_mmu_notifier_del(struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn,
- struct i915_mmu_object *mo)
-{
- spin_lock(&mn->lock);
- list_del(&mo->link);
- if (mo->is_linear)
- mn->has_linear = i915_mmu_notifier_has_linear(mn);
- else
- interval_tree_remove(&mo->it, &mn->objects);
- spin_unlock(&mn->lock);
-}
-
static void
i915_gem_userptr_release__mmu_notifier(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
{
@@ -265,7 +187,9 @@ i915_gem_userptr_release__mmu_notifier(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
if (mo == NULL)
return;
- i915_mmu_notifier_del(mo->mn, mo);
+ spin_lock(&mo->mn->lock);
+ del_object(mo);
+ spin_unlock(&mo->mn->lock);
kfree(mo);
obj->userptr.mmu_object = NULL;
@@ -299,7 +223,6 @@ i915_gem_userptr_init__mmu_notifier(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
{
struct i915_mmu_notifier *mn;
struct i915_mmu_object *mo;
- int ret;
if (flags & I915_USERPTR_UNSYNCHRONIZED)
return capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) ? 0 : -EPERM;
@@ -316,16 +239,10 @@ i915_gem_userptr_init__mmu_notifier(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
return -ENOMEM;
mo->mn = mn;
- mo->it.start = obj->userptr.ptr;
- mo->it.last = mo->it.start + obj->base.size - 1;
mo->obj = obj;
- INIT_WORK(&mo->work, __cancel_userptr__worker);
-
- ret = i915_mmu_notifier_add(obj->base.dev, mn, mo);
- if (ret) {
- kfree(mo);
- return ret;
- }
+ mo->it.start = obj->userptr.ptr;
+ mo->it.last = obj->userptr.ptr + obj->base.size - 1;
+ INIT_WORK(&mo->work, cancel_userptr);
obj->userptr.mmu_object = mo;
return 0;
@@ -552,8 +469,10 @@ __i915_gem_userptr_set_active(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
/* In order to serialise get_pages with an outstanding
* cancel_userptr, we must drop the struct_mutex and try again.
*/
- if (!value || !work_pending(&obj->userptr.mmu_object->work))
- obj->userptr.mmu_object->active = value;
+ if (!value)
+ del_object(obj->userptr.mmu_object);
+ else if (!work_pending(&obj->userptr.mmu_object->work))
+ add_object(obj->userptr.mmu_object);
else
ret = -EAGAIN;
spin_unlock(&obj->userptr.mmu_object->mn->lock);
--
2.7.0.rc3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
