Op 05-01-16 om 09:35 schreef Daniel Vetter: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:53:19PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 11 ++++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> index 1e42309ec40a..b76778d76035 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >> @@ -15421,6 +15421,7 @@ static void intel_sanitize_crtc(struct intel_crtc *crtc) >> WARN_ON(drm_atomic_set_mode_for_crtc(crtc->base.state, NULL) < 0); >> crtc->base.state->active = crtc->active; >> crtc->base.enabled = crtc->active; >> + crtc->base.state->connector_mask = 0; >> >> /* Because we only establish the connector -> encoder -> >> * crtc links if something is active, this means the >> @@ -15456,20 +15457,24 @@ static void intel_sanitize_encoder(struct intel_encoder *encoder) >> { >> struct intel_connector *connector; >> struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev; >> + struct drm_crtc *crtc = encoder->base.crtc; >> bool active = false; >> >> /* We need to check both for a crtc link (meaning that the >> * encoder is active and trying to read from a pipe) and the >> * pipe itself being active. */ >> - bool has_active_crtc = encoder->base.crtc && >> - to_intel_crtc(encoder->base.crtc)->active; >> + bool has_active_crtc = crtc && crtc->state->active; >> >> for_each_intel_connector(dev, connector) { >> if (connector->base.encoder != &encoder->base) >> continue; >> >> active = true; >> - break; >> + if (!has_active_crtc) >> + break; >> + >> + crtc->state->connector_mask |= >> + 1 << drm_connector_index(&connector->base); > I still think this is the wrong place. Imo this should be done in > intel_modeset_update_connector_atomic_state. It'd be great if we could > somehow share the logic with drm_atomic_set_crtc_for_connector even, but > that's probably over the top. > No it should be done sooner. I want to be able use it anywhere in the .crtc_disable calls without worrying about it.. ~Maarten _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx