On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 12:01:57PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi, > > On 8 December 2015 at 08:49, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > We want this for consistency with existing page_flip semantics. > > > > Since this spurred quite a discussion on IRC also document why we > > reject even generation when the pipe is off: It's not that it's hard > > to implement, but userspace has a track recording proofing that it's > > way too easy to accidentally abuse and cause havoc. We want to make > > sure userspace doesn't get away with that. > > > > v2: Somehow thought we do reject events already, but that code only > > existed in my imagination ... Also suggestions from Thierry. > > What a beautifully-coloured shed. > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Added Ilia's spelling fixes and merged to drm-misc, thanks for the review. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
