On 22/12/15 11:52, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 04:45:51PM +0530, Ankitprasad Sharma wrote:
Compiler does not complain about possible truncation here? I would
change it to a type of equivalent width just in case. Even before it was
loff_t.
Never saw a compiler warning related to this truncation. Though this is
not going to affect the functionality, I will update it to u64.
Which is ridiculous.
Well you are campaigning for -Werror. :)
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
