On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 04:45:51PM +0530, Ankitprasad Sharma wrote: > > Compiler does not complain about possible truncation here? I would > > change it to a type of equivalent width just in case. Even before it was > > loff_t. > Never saw a compiler warning related to this truncation. Though this is > not going to affect the functionality, I will update it to u64. Which is ridiculous. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
