On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 08:23:57PM +0200, Patrik Jakobsson wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 02:37:07PM +0200, Patrik Jakobsson wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >> Here's my take on it (I assume it needs some discussion):
>> >>
>> >> int
>> >> set_tcb_priv_data(struct tcb *tcp, void *priv_data)
>> >> {
>> >> /* A free callback is required before setting private data and private
>> >> * data must be set back to NULL before being set again.
>> >> */
>> >
>> > I think a single function initializing both _priv_data and _free_priv_data
>> > would suffice:
>> >
>> > int
>> > set_tcb_priv_data(struct tcb *tcp, void *priv_data,
>> > void (*free_priv_data)(void *))
>> > {
>> > if (tcp->_priv_data)
>> > return -1;
>> >
>> > tcp->_free_priv_data = free_priv_data;
>> > tcp->_priv_data = priv_data;
>> >
>> > return 0;
>> > }
>>
>> Sure, and since they always come in a pairs it might be even better. If it turns
>> out we need it split up it is easily done later.
>
> The discussion seems to be stalled.
> Patrik, would you like to prepare a patch?
Hi Dmitry
I'll send you new patches this weekend. Thanks for reminding me.
-Patrik
>
>
> --
> ldv
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
