On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 08:23:57PM +0200, Patrik Jakobsson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 02:37:07PM +0200, Patrik Jakobsson wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Here's my take on it (I assume it needs some discussion):
> >>
> >> int
> >> set_tcb_priv_data(struct tcb *tcp, void *priv_data)
> >> {
> >> /* A free callback is required before setting private data and private
> >> * data must be set back to NULL before being set again.
> >> */
> >
> > I think a single function initializing both _priv_data and _free_priv_data
> > would suffice:
> >
> > int
> > set_tcb_priv_data(struct tcb *tcp, void *priv_data,
> > void (*free_priv_data)(void *))
> > {
> > if (tcp->_priv_data)
> > return -1;
> >
> > tcp->_free_priv_data = free_priv_data;
> > tcp->_priv_data = priv_data;
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> Sure, and since they always come in a pairs it might be even better. If it turns
> out we need it split up it is easily done later.
The discussion seems to be stalled.
Patrik, would you like to prepare a patch?
--
ldv
Attachment:
pgpjq6FchwI3n.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
